书体:

楷书

色彩:

装裱形式:

册(蝴蝶装)

创作时间:

文字类型:

汉文

质地:

本幅纸

释文:

十朋伏蒙宠示。室铭题跋。并和诗。三复钦歎。诗词意俱工。但过情之誉。非所敢当耳。铭跋高深微妙。然有所未谕者。不欺二字。岂晚学无力量之人。所敢拟议。以是名室。自知得罪。窃效古人坐右铭。聊以自警云耳。张丞相以合天人为不欺。深得中庸谨独。论语一贯之旨。其说非不广大。其为训戒也亦深且至矣。而高见以为未广。如是。则吾夫子所谓惟天为大。吾谁欺。欺天乎之语。亦未广耶。近世学者。多流入于异端。反以（为字点去）吾圣人之道为小。又以天为小。而求其所谓大。于虚无荒唐清寂灭。不验无实之间。是之所谓大者。非欺而何。不谓贤者过之。而亦为是说也。大是饶舌。及神游毘邪离城。稽首丈室等语。虽出于戏翰弄墨。然先圣贤所不道。六经所不载。恐非先生长者为后学之训。未敢承教。金华子之学。亦杂于佛老。至其读和韩诗。有想见大颠师。不应谈习么之句。识者伟之。圣道不明久矣。诸儒不能无罪。因高论雄文之及。辄敢布其狂言。十朋惶恐。右谨具呈。左奉议郎充集英殿修撰权发遣饶州军州事王十朋劄子。

印记资料:

题跋资料:

题跋类别：题签；    宋王梅溪十朋书；全文：

题跋类别：作者款识；作者：王十朋；题跋位置：本幅；款识：左奉议郎充集英殿修撰权发遣饶州军州事王十朋劄子行书

主题:

技法:

参考资料:

收藏着录： 石渠宝笈续编（干清宫），第一册，页445 收藏着录： 故宫书画录（卷三），第一册，页180 参考书目： 1.梅韵秋，〈书劄子〉，收入何传馨主编，《文艺绍兴：南宋艺术与文化‧书画卷》（台北：国立故宫博物院，2010年十月初版一刷），页352-353。 内容简介（中文）： 王十朋（1112-1171）是南宋早期的文学大家，兼擅经学，尤重将儒学经术贯彻到起居生活之中。隆兴初年出知江西饶州时，他曾将官邸寓舍取名为「不欺室」，勉励自己能片刻不离正道。除倩宰相张浚撰写室铭，又广邀同侪题跋作诗，本劄的收受人即为其中之一。但此人写作喜用佛家术语，与十朋平日拒谈佛、老的立场正相牴触，遂引来十朋的严辞挞伐，至以「异端」一词来指斥当时沉溺于佛、老之学的儒士。(20101015) 内容简介（英文）： Wang Shipeng was a literary master of the early Southern Song who also excelled at the Classics, particularly focusing on the implementation of Confucian thought in daily life. In the early Longxing era (1163-1165), while serving as Administrator of Raozhou in Jiangxi, Wang named his official residence the “Studio of No Deception,” reminding himself to remain on the path of righteousness at all times. Wang not only asked Grand Councilor Zhang Jun to calligraph the title plaque for his studio but also many friends to write colophons or poems for it. The recipient of this note was one of them. This scholar, however, liked to use Buddhist terms. Wang, who always refused to touch on matters dealing with either Buddhism or Daoism, went into a tirade here, using the term “heretics” to reprimand Confucian scholars who immersed themselves in Buddhist or Daoist thought.(20101015)